
Email me when the next worthy source hits.
The Gnome has a confession. He is not the first small person you have heard about. He is not even the first one science wrote down. For at least a century, medicine has kept a file on people who see tiny people, and it did not put the file in the drawer marked fairy tales. It put it in the drawer marked neurology. Here is the file. Every line has a receipt.
In July 1909 a French psychiatrist, Raoul Leroy, stood up at the Societe medico-psychologique in Paris and described patients who saw little people: small, often brightly dressed, often cheerful, moving through the room like they owned it. He named the condition after Gulliver's Lilliput and published it that year in the Annales medico-psychologiques. The term stuck. It is still the term.
Receipt: Leroy, R. (1909). Les hallucinations lilliputiennes. Annales medico-psychologiques (Paris), 9e serie, tome 2, 67e annee, pp. 278-289 (short form: Ann Med Psychol 1909;67:278-289). The 1909 text is transcribed at histoiredelafolie.fr, archived at web.archive.org (the source site is down at the time of writing). A 2021 systematic review of every case report since then, "Leroy's elusive little people" (Blom, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2021; DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.002; PubMed 33676962), gathered the literature and found the little people are usually seen with open eyes, in the real room, and that the people who see them are often not frightened. They are, the review notes, sometimes amused.
Claims-as-claims line: the patients' little people were hallucinations. The Gnome is a character. Nobody here is telling you the little people are real. We are telling you the FILE is real.
Every gnome you have ever seen sits under the same mushroom: red cap, white spots. That is Amanita muscaria, the fly agaric. It is the mushroom of every fairy-tale illustration, every garden ornament, and, it turns out, every pharmacology textbook that covers it, because its active compounds, ibotenic acid and muscimol, act on the brain's glutamate and GABA systems. Muscimol is the stronger of the two and is described in the literature as sedative, hypnotic, and hallucinogenic. Drying the mushroom converts ibotenic acid to muscimol. The people who painted gnomes under that mushroom for two hundred years may not have known the chemistry. The mushroom did.
Receipt: a toxicological and pharmacological profile of Amanita muscaria is published in Pharmacia (pensoft, 2020, article 56112). The U.S. FDA published a scientific memorandum on Amanita muscaria on 9 September 2024 (fda.gov/media/184512). Case reports of rising recreational use are in the clinical literature (PMC12239171). The Gnome's line: do not eat the decor. This page is history and pharmacology, not instructions.
In 2020 a Johns Hopkins team published a survey of 2,561 people who reported an "entity encounter" after inhaling N,N-dimethyltryptamine. The most common words respondents used for what they met were being, guide, spirit, alien, and helper. Most said the entity seemed conscious, intelligent, and benevolent. Many said the encounter changed what they believed about reality afterward. This is a peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, not a forum thread.
Receipt: Davis, A. K., Clifton, J. M., Weaver, E. G., Hurwitz, E. S., Johnson, M. W., and Griffiths, R. R. (2020). Survey of entity encounter experiences occasioned by inhaled N,N-dimethyltryptamine: phenomenology, interpretation, and enduring effects. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 34(9), 1008-1020. DOI 10.1177/0269881120916143. PubMed 32345112.
Claims-as-claims line: a survey records what people report. It does not settle what they met. The Gnome is not going to settle it either. He is going to point out that the reports are consistent across a century, a chemistry, and a questionnaire, and that this is exactly the kind of thing a person digs into.
Humans have always seen the little people. Sometimes it was a fever. Sometimes it was a mushroom. Sometimes it was a lab survey with a consent form. The pattern is older than any of the explanations, and the explanations keep being written by serious people in serious journals. That is the whole house in one page: the vessel is absurd, the citations are exact, and nobody is being condescended to. Dig. Verify. Bring the gem.
1. LEROY 1909: "In a world. Where a Paris psychiatrist. Named the little people. After Gulliver." The 1909 date on screen. 2. THE GNOME MUSHROOM: red cap, white spots, one word on the bar: MUSCIMOL. The FDA memo date on screen. 3. THE SURVEY: 2,561 people. Five words: being, guide, spirit, alien, helper. The DOI on screen. Source footage for the series is original (the atelier: the seal, the mushroom, type on black), not clipped from anyone.
Receipts, all settled: Davis et al. 2020 by registry (Crossref, DOI 10.1177/0269881120916143; PMID 32345112; the 2,561 figure from the publisher's page). Leroy 1909 pp. 278-289 by the archived transcription header (web.archive.org copy of histoiredelafolie.fr) and independently by the PMC review "Visual hallucinatory syndromes: past, present, and future" (Ann Med Psychol 1909;67:278-289). Blom 2021 by DOI. Szara 1958 and muscimol per the sources above. Anything that moves goes in the corrections log at /pages/rights.
Dig. Verify. Bring the gem.